Essay --

Since the time of Parmenides in the 5th vitamin C BCE, philosophers obtain been intrigued by the existence of a physical world and be in it. They have studied the nature of being, existence, and reality in what is eruptright knget as ontology. Being part of (arguably) the largest branch of philosophy metaphysics ontologists have tried to dig deeper into questions of how things potful exist and how they can be verbalize to exist, have analyzed the similarities and differences, and have even broadened the spectrum all the way out to human life and what aspects make up a human being. However, ontology evolved and became more than and more generally applied and philosophers started considering the ontology (existence) of graven image, or rather simply a supreme or all-powerful being. One of the well-nigh notable ontological arguments of the existence of God comes from Renee Descates who lend oneselfs his argument of the existence of God as a way to develop a system of attain ing certain (absolute) knowledge through and through clear and distinct perception.In this essay, I will attempt to summary in detail Descartes ontological argument and its purpose, detail slightly of the most promising objections to the argument, and present compelling counterarguments to those objections.I. The Ontological Argument Descartes establishes the fact that he exists as a self-thinking entity and he believes this to be certain knowledge because he clearly and clearly perceives himself to be and he could not do so without existing and having the cognitive faculties to think this I am certain of my own existence because I clearly and distinctly perceive it so I now seem to establish a general rule that whatsoever I clearly and distinctly perceive is true (III, 2). But in that location is one slight... ...t clear and distinct perceptions are true. For something to be clearly and distinctly perceived, we must be actively accompanyance to it. The only reason for De scartes to tally God into the equation is to ensure that doubt does not overtake these perceptions in after we stop attending to them. Therefore, Descartes can in fact use clear and distinct perception to prove the existence of God. In the consequence of Gods existence he uses clear and distinct perceptions which he is actively attending to, and so (by the established standard), they must be true. So now that God is proven to be true, this allows the thinker to not have to actively attend to his perceptions in order for them to be true, making the amount of perceptions one can have limitless.General Comments1. No fluff Theres some padding in your writing that doesnt contribute to your arguments at all. reduce it.