Assessment of the War on Terror Essay Example for Free

Assessment of the War on terror EssayThe compulsion and the non-necessity of wars in the course of human history and societal change whitethorn be seen from 2 diametrically opposing views. On the one hand, it is considered needed in the sense similar to Adolf Hitlers stance on war and its critical function in the evolution of man and society. In his movement entitled Mein Kampf, he writes, Mankind has grown strong in eternal struggles and it will only run low through eternal peace (1943, p. 45). On the other hand, pacifist thinkers such as Mahatma Gandhi do non assent to the idea that wars are necessary. On the contrary, his notion of civil disobedience is founded on the principle of ahimsa, that is, numerate non-violence.The Gulf Wars, a term currently used to refer to the series of wars which occurred in the past devil decades with its culmination in what is popularly known as the United States of Americas Invasion of Iraq in 2003.The striking fact though is that the different moral convictions of the people is made manifest even in their choice of words to refer to the aforementioned Invasion of Iraq. Invasion is a derogatory word. The fancy of encroachment assumes the existence of a hostile party who will cause turmoil and havoc within other territory. However, for those who assent to the Bush administration, the proper term is not invasion but rather, liberation. As opposed to invasion, the concept of liberation assumes the renewal of a repressed freedom.These insights point surface that human social reality is held turbulent by systems of power and power relations, most especially in the context of international politics and a globalized, capital-driven economy. Globalization is indeed, the current paradigm. This papers task involves an evaluation of the political motivations that cigaret justify the necessity of war.One may perceive the current United States War on terror in two ways. First, one may perceive it as an appeal to the Mess ianic aspect of man in price of which man enables the liberation of his neighbor from conditions that restrict his freedom. Second, one may view it as a agriculturals plight for continuous economic growth thereby sacrificing the life of the few and the interests of other nations for the procural of its own interests. It is important to note that Bush Administrations War on Terrorism can be summed as a countrys plight for economic power at the disbursal of the blood of the few. If such is the case, the aforementioned war does not thereby adhere to the main propositions of what may considered, as a just war, which states that the use of force by one nation against the other, is always wrong(p) unless the latter has forfeited its basic rights (Lackey 222). It is important to note that in order for basic rights to be forfeited, it is necessary that the other state has already used force in violation of the basic rights of other states or it has threatened to use force in violation o f the basic rights of other states and made preparations to carry out their threat (Lackey 229).Another instance wherein a state has forfeited its basic rights is apparent during instances wherein its ability to set up is disrupted by a secessionist movement which is representative in character or when the state in question has engaged in massive violations of basic personal rights (Lackey 229). These conditions, however, were not initially met by Iran forward the aforementioned War on Terror.ReferencesHitler, Adolf (1943). Mien Kampf. Trans. Ralf Manheim. London Houghton Mifflin.Lackey, Douglas. The Ethics of War and Peace.