Exposing the Falseness of Truth in On the Nature of the Universe Essay

Exposing the Falseness of Truth in On the reputation of the Universe Truth is in the eye of the beholder. Or is it? Questions regarding the reputation of rightfulness have always been central to not lone(prenominal) philosophers, but each men (and women, of course) who possess any desire for friendship. For while trueness itself is an problematic concept, it is also the underlying theme of all science -- which is the basis of knowledge -- and so the seeker of learning must first discover his get law about the world without a strong belief, the slippery nature of truth will only serve to confuse and mislead the educatee of life. A person who is lacking a basic understanding of truth can neer fully grasp the fine distinction amongst appearance and reality, yet the ability to separate the two is essential to anyone interest in knowledge at a higher level, where appearances lead only to dead ends. Or do they? And who says appearance is not reality? At the heart of this matt er is the conflict between truth as an dogmatic and the truth of the senses while this may seem like a tiny matter (truth is true, isnt it?), it is anything but. If there does indeed exist an absolute truth, as the Socratics claim, therefore all attempts to understand the universe are futile, since hu public senses can never adequately grasp a truth that is so far to a higher place everyday experience. On the other hand, the Epicurean keep an eye on of truth is a lot more encouraging after all, this explanation of truth as cosmos of the senses offers the hope that individuals have the ability to create, and therefore understand, their own universe. The Epicureans, by advocating truth of the senses, basically claim that whatever appears to be something, really is, whereas followers of Socrates would disc... ...y that this argumentation over its relativity can ever be satisfactorily settled. Nevertheless, twain philosophies have valid arguments, and each also has its merits from the common mans point of view while Platos truth appeals to the seekers of knowledge and idealists who dream of a perfect world, Lucretius definition of truth brings comfort to those who need to believe that what they can see and intent is a reliable representation of reality. Both of these explanations could be valid, yet the inquiry remains, and will continue to haunt philosophers as long as man continues to philosophize what is truth, and if someone accidentally stumbles on its actual nature, how will he recognize it when all he has learned is the art of doubt? Bibliography Lucretius. On the Nature of the Universe. Tr. R. E. Latham. Introduction by John Godwin. Penguin Books, London 1994.